Heroku - Latest Comments

Re: Heroku | Multiple Ruby Version Support on Heroku

jnozsc — Fri, 11 May 2012 11:27:56 -0000

Thanks Terence. After migrating my apps to cedar server, it works. Thanks

Re: Heroku | Multiple Ruby Version Support on Heroku

Terence Lee — Thu, 10 May 2012 12:37:48 -0000

You're using bamboo. You'll need to use cedar to take advantage of this.

Re: Heroku | Multiple Ruby Version Support on Heroku

Terence Lee — Thu, 10 May 2012 12:34:04 -0000

tl;dr you can use `bundle pack --all` on 1.2.0.pre which runs on cedar, see https://github.com/carlhuda/bu...

Thanks for bringing this issue up.

Re: Heroku | Multiple Ruby Version Support on Heroku

Kyle Drake — Thu, 10 May 2012 10:56:28 -0000

Awesome!

While on the topic of Heroku and Bundler, there's been a lot of requests for the ability to package gems from private github repositories. Bundler currently doesn't support this, it would be super awesome if you could spare a developer to implement this, I no longer have the time to work on it unfortunately. It's a huge use case with Heroku.

The relevant ticket is here: https://github.com/carlhuda/bu...

Re: Heroku | Multiple Ruby Version Support on Heroku

jnozsc — Thu, 10 May 2012 01:34:01 -0000

-----> Heroku receiving push
-----> Ruby/Sinatra app detected
-----> Gemfile detected, running Bundler version 1.0.7
Unresolved dependencies detected; Installing...

well, I have already installed bundler 1.2.0 and then add

gem 'bundler', '1.2.0.pre'

into the Gemfile and Gemlock

when I run 'bundle install' it returns "Using bundler 1.2.0"

what's wrong with my configuration? any suggestions?

Re: Heroku | Multiple Ruby Version Support on Heroku

JosephFouad — Wed, 09 May 2012 20:53:38 -0000

When this feature will be available to java?
when can we choose the version of th JDK to run our applications on?
At least, is there any plans to support JDK 1.7 in the near future ?

thanks
Joe

Re: Heroku | Multiple Ruby Version Support on Heroku

Wil Moore III — Wed, 09 May 2012 15:48:11 -0000

Awesome addition.

Re: Heroku | Multiple Ruby Version Support on Heroku

Steven Fowler — Wed, 09 May 2012 15:41:38 -0000

Thank you. This just makes a great service even better

Re: Heroku | Multiple Ruby Version Support on Heroku

Ryan McGeary — Wed, 09 May 2012 15:02:47 -0000

Oh, but our PATH config var was out of order too. `bin` wasn't at the front. I'm guessing that's why we saw the trouble.

Re: Heroku | Multiple Ruby Version Support on Heroku

Ryan McGeary — Wed, 09 May 2012 14:59:03 -0000

David, That's not actually the behavior I saw. My app was reverted to ruby-1.9.2 today on a deploy that happened soon after this blog post (We were set to RUBY_VERSION=1.9.3-p125). I had user_env_compile and RUBY_VERSION. It's no biggie now; I've updated my Gemfile to conform with the new convention, but I'm not sure if I experienced an unintended fluke or not.

Re: Heroku | Multiple Ruby Version Support on Heroku

David Dollar — Wed, 09 May 2012 14:43:22 -0000

If you try to push with `user_env_compile` and `RUBY_VERSION` now, it will continue to work, but you'll see a message like this:

https://gist.github.com/819f66...

Re: Heroku | Multiple Ruby Version Support on Heroku

Ryan McGeary — Wed, 09 May 2012 14:23:41 -0000

Cool, but it looks like this now removes support for the user_env_compile and RUBY_VERSION config var support. I'm guessing I missed that deprecation announcement.

Re: Heroku | Multiple Ruby Version Support on Heroku

fbjork — Wed, 09 May 2012 14:21:31 -0000

If you're getting the following error:

Your Ruby version is 1.9.2, but your Gemfile specified 1.9.3

make sure you run this to fix it:
heroku config:add PATH=bin:vendor/bundle/ruby/1.9.1/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/in:/bin

Re: Heroku | Multiple Ruby Version Support on Heroku

Terence Lee — Wed, 09 May 2012 13:58:47 -0000

You need to upgrade your version of Bundler to use `1.2.0.pre`

Re: Heroku | Multiple Ruby Version Support on Heroku

telinnerud — Wed, 09 May 2012 13:40:58 -0000

Sorry, I can see now that you explained this in the introduction.

Re: Heroku | Multiple Ruby Version Support on Heroku

David Cook — Wed, 09 May 2012 13:38:45 -0000

When I try to add it, I get:

"undefined method `ruby' for #

Re: Heroku | Multiple Ruby Version Support on Heroku

Schneems — Wed, 09 May 2012 13:37:04 -0000

Heroku is reading in a variable from bundler. We can't comment on our Ruby roadmap or the possibilities of non MRI right now.

Re: Heroku | Multiple Ruby Version Support on Heroku

telinnerud — Wed, 09 May 2012 13:31:37 -0000

This is great. Some questions though: Can you comment on how this actually works (high level)? Is this a bundler feature or heroku reading the config from bundler? Are you considering adding non-MRI rubies?

For anyone wondering, the devcenter article says that only MRI 1.9.2 and 1.9.3 is available right now.

Re: Heroku | Multiple Ruby Version Support on Heroku

Schneems — Wed, 09 May 2012 13:30:12 -0000

Great!

Re: Heroku | Multiple Ruby Version Support on Heroku

Estanislau Trepat — Wed, 09 May 2012 12:20:57 -0000

This is great news!

Did the changes, deployed and now my app is running on 1.9.3p194! So far no problems encountered.

Great job! Keep up the good work.

Thanks a lot.

Re: Heroku | Announcing Better SSL For Your App

Matthew Windwer — Sun, 06 May 2012 17:34:59 -0000

Do you have any plans on bringing SNI SSL to Cedar?

Since most apps have a session, and any app that has a session should be using SSL nowadays to protect their users, then nearly every app on Heroku should be using SSL. That would mean $20/month just to get a low-traffic app up and running on a custom domain.

Will you be launching another option at a lower price point for Cedar?

Re: Heroku | Announcing Better SSL For Your App

craigkerstiens — Thu, 03 May 2012 21:49:24 -0000

Yes, at some point in the future IP-based SSL will be phased out. Naked domains have scalability limitations due to required the A record to be set. In place of this a redirect to the secure domain would be a more scalable solution, you can read more on this at: https://devcenter.heroku.com/a...

Re: Heroku | Heroku's new, free PostgreSQL 9.1 development database

Revenazb — Thu, 03 May 2012 18:23:43 -0000

Any postgis love on the new dev db?

Re: Heroku | Announcing Better SSL For Your App

Jacob Rosenberg — Thu, 03 May 2012 18:18:30 -0000

This is great stuff. Two questions:

1) Does this mean IP-based SSL will be eventually phased out? If so, does this mean naked domain support is something you guys intend to avoid? Does this then mean that the best option is to host a server with an A record on HTTP that will redirect to our app's secure domain on heroku using HTTPS?

2) I switched to SSL endpoint and now notice that nginx logs seem to have disappeared from my app log. Is this intended? I can no longer see IP addresses and a few other useful bits of info.

Thanks again!

Re: Heroku | Announcing Better SSL For Your App

Johnny Ray — Thu, 03 May 2012 17:31:34 -0000

Nice!